OHIM HELD TO HAVE ERRED IN FINDING THAT CLASS 5 GOODS HAD SAME PURPOSE

This article first appeared on WTR Daily, part of World Trademark Review, in (November/2014) In Novartis AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) (Case T-444/12, October 16 2014), the General Court (Fifth Chamber) has ruled on the likelihood of confusion between two marks by  considering active […]